NSW Energy Ombudsman EWON’s people are leading it into disrepute

Most organisations strive to avoid their names being brought into disrepute by those representing them.

On this count, I simply have no idea how or from where EWON gets people of such disappointing quality as I have had to deal with in my repeated complaints through it against the thieving electricity retailer, Powershop. 

As this representative is underperforming to the degree that she simply can’t even respond to an email as if she has actually read it, I wonder, now publicly, simply, when will she do the job for which she is employed? 

Alternatively, I wonder how EWON itself may have been compromised by the power utility she appears to be defending. She certainly doesn’t appear to be working for me, as Powershop’s aggrieved, wronged customer.

A brief history

On February 8, 2025, our company’s office in Surry Hills, Sydney, was afflicted by a fire, which has rendered it unusable since. Because it is unused, we have also not been using any electricity there in the time since. 

Shortly after the fire, I notified our energy retailer Powershop, to tell it that if it charges us for electricity we are not using, this will be theft.

Its response has been to continue to charge us for power on a rate higher than when we were actually using the office each day to conduct our business.

This conduct deserved reporting to EWON, the Energy & Water Ombudsman NSW, a relationship with which I was first absolutely delighted – until I had to begin dealing with Terese Skene, Conciliator. 

Since then my impression of its competence has headed rapidly and consistently southwards.

It seems she has given up reading anything written to her, as her latest reply to the message I sent on [date] makes reference to a “property developer.” Go on, can you find such a reference in the letter beneath?

On this date, I wrote to her concerning her nonsensical reply to my earlier correspondence, this time with definitive proof that we could not have possibly used the electricity in question because the supply had been cut off to our floor. 

I believe this is unambiguous, as shown here, in the email from Kevin O’Neill.

Having also written to Louise Sylvan, the chair of EWON, with the same evidence (via Australia Post snail mail), in my email of August 12, I relayed to Skene:

“I wrote to her [Sylvan]: “Further as of Friday, July 25, as attached, I am now in possession of an email – copy enclosed – from Kevin O’Neill, of Bentino, the project manager responsible for the remedial construction work being carried out at 35 Buckingham Street, stating unequivocally that it, “terminated the main feed to level three to make safe the works on that floor. This work was completed on March 05, 2025.

“Hence, not only have we not used any electricity since that date, even had we wanted to, it would not be possible. Therefore what Powershop is trying to achieve in billing us is sheer theft.

“Please read this again: Kevin O’Neill is the guy actually responsible for the construction work being carried out at 35 Buckingham Street, so one might imagine that he knows better than anyone else what is going on. Please present this to Powershop to see how its clowns respond.

“Against this evidence, the resolution you have presented to us is simply laughable and not good enough, and I would be happy to stand up in any court in the land in our defence against Powershop’s despicable efforts to steal from us.”

I closed that letter by stating:

“Sorry, but I am not impressed by my dealings to date with EWON, and having done my research, I now know where to complain. As a former copy editor on the Australian Financial Review, I also know extremely well how the media works, so if Powershop comes after me, I will make this embarrassing spectacle public. Somehow, I can’t see this doing you or EWON any favours, either.”

This is Skene’s reply:

25 Aug 2025

Dear ​Mr Lauren

EWON Complaint Reference:    ​469968

I refer to your complaint with Powershop regarding your electricity account for Studio 8 FL 3/35 Buckingham St Surry Hills NSW 2010.

I acknowledge your email dated 12 August 2025 and acknowledge that with the response date there was a typographical error requesting your response to the email sent to you on 7 August 2025. The response date was 14 August 2025.

In your email you provided a copy of an email from the property developer. Whilst the property developers email advises that an electrician attended the property, the email does not detail the works undertaken by the electrician.

The paperwork required is a Certificate of Compliance for electrical work (CCEW). This document confirms electrical work has been completed to the required safety and compliance standards. It’s issued by a licensed electrical contractor and is a crucial record of the work, especially for future reference or if further electrical work is needed. 

The CCEW serves as proof that electrical work, such as installations or alterations, meets the necessary safety standards. The CCEW confirms that the electrical work complies with standards like AS/NZS 3000 Wiring Rules, industry safety standards, and NSW Service and Installation Rules. A copy of the CCEW must also be submitted to the electricity distributor Ausgrid or your retailer within seven days of the work being completed.  I have attached a copy of the CCEW to this email.

On 28 May 2025, Powershop received a meter fault notification (MFN) for your meter not communicating.

On 12 June 2025, a technician from Ausgrid attended the property and advised your meter could not be replaced as the site was deenergised as a service fuse had been removed. It appears that the service fuse was removed prior to Ausgrids’s attendance. It would be appreciated if further information could be provided by the electrician so that usage could be appropriately reviewed and billed.

On 15 July 2025, I requested the metering provider attend the property again to obtain an actual meter read to reconcile the estimated invoice. The metering provider attended the property on 22 July 2025 and was unable to access the meter due to access issues being renovations at the property.

Your meter is next due to read on 1 October 2025.

As the account is in your name and information from the electrician has not been provided, Powershop may continue to issue invoices. I acknowledge your advice that renovations continue at the site and that access may be prevented. Estimated bills may be issued on this basis.

Next actions

Powershop has offered for resolution of your complaint to waive the usage charges for period 8 February 2025 to 8 March 2025. The usage charges to be waived is $476.81.

Once the usage charges have been waived the balance payable would be $1,414.59.

Powershop has offered to waive the supply fees from 15 July 2025.

We would appreciate it if you could provide Powershop the requested paperwork to confirm the date the electricity supply was deenergised and the works the electrician performed at the property (CCEW). Powershop have indicated that they will consider the charges billed to you upon receipt of the above information.

Please consider the information provided in this email and contact me by 1 September 2025 on Freecall 1800 246 545 or by return email if you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the contents of this email further. If I do not hear from you by close of business on 1 September 2025 your file will be closed.

Yours sincerely 

​​Terese Skene

Dispute Resolution Team 

Energy & Water Ombudsman NSW

Which of the following headlines do MG Australia’s executives least want to read here?

I am writing and personally delivering this message – by hand – to MG's senior Australian executives and dealer principals to find out which they prefer to shape their company's reputation in the motoring and social media. Which would you choose? And, well done, Mr Allaf, you brought this on MG and yourself.

MG’s 10-Year Warranty Collapses in 10 Days: A $32,000 Mistake I’ll Make Sure Others Don’t

From Roadside to Reputation Ruin: MG’s Customer Experience Nightmare Will Go Public

Shonky MG Dealership Service Forces Journalist to Go Public – Car Dead, Support Missing

MG Ignored Me. The Internet and My Motoring Media Contacts Won’t.

Dear MG: Fix This Now or Watch Me Make Sure No One Else Buys One

MG’s Reputation Hits a Wall: When a Motoring Journalist Is Treated Like This, What Hope for Others?

Ripped Off by MG: My Brand-New Lemon and CX Nightmare

MG: Where Defective Products Meet Deplorable After-Sales Service

The MG Fiasco: How a New Car Purchase Became a Public Relations Disaster

Broken Promises: MG’s Customer Service Is a Complete Disgrace!

Shattered Expectations: Why MG’s Reputation Will Suffer From My Experience

A $32,000 Regret: The Nightmare of Buying an MG HS

MG’s Poor Quality and Worse Service: A Recipe for Customer Outrage!

MG’s Defective Vehicle and Abysmal Service: A Disaster Waiting to Ruin Its Reputation

From Birthday Joy to Breakdown: How MG’s Failure Betrayed a Loyal Customer and Threatens Its Brand

MG’s Broken Promises: Defective Car, Broken Service, and a Reputation in Freefall

MG’s Faulty Car and Customer Service Nightmare – The Story That Will Spread Like Wildfire

How MG’s Neglect and Defective Product Will Cost Them More Than $32,000 in Lost Trust

MG’s Roadside Assistance Failure: A Catalyst for Social Media Backlash and Media Exposure

Defective MG HS and Disgraceful Service: I’m Using My Media Contacts to Warn Every Potential Buyer

MG’s Customer Experience Catastrophe: Prepare for a Public Relations Crisis Fueled by My Story

Ten Days to Failure, Ten Years of Regret: How MG’s Defective Product and Broken Promises Will Echo Across Every Motoring Publication in Australia

$32,000 Down the Drain: Why This Former Wheels Magazine Writer Will Use Every Media Contact to Expose MG’s Shameful Treatment of Customers

Breaking Down on Day Two, Breaking Trust Forever: A Professional Journalist’s Promise to Broadcast MG’s Failures Across Social Media and Motoring Press

Consumer Law Violation and Media Reckoning: How MG’s Defective HS and Appalling Service Will Become a Case Study in Corporate Failure

From Tow Truck to Front Page: Why MG’s 10-Day Product Failure Will Soon Be Trending Across Australian Automotive Media

The $32,000 Mistake That Will Haunt MG’s Reputation: A Motoring Industry Insider’s Public Declaration of War Against Corporate Negligence

Ten Days to Breakdown, Ten Years of Bad Press: Why Every Future MG Customer Deserves to Know What Really Happens When Things Go Wrong

From Financial Review to Social Media Storm: How One Defective MG HS Will Generate More Negative Publicity Than MG’s Marketing Budget Can Counter

Another letter of anger to Powershop, dated May 5, 2025

Today, I posted this to the three executives named beneath, as it is simply not worthy of being our energy supplier.

As not one of you – Tim Olsen, Michael Benveniste or Kristen Goodgame – replied to my email of complaint of March 31, I will be taking it to Energy & Water Ombudsman NSW (EWON)

Mr Olsen/ Mr Benveniste/ Ms Goodgame

On the above date, as I am being ripped off by Powershop, I wrote the letter to you, beneath. Yet, as, instead of solving my problem, you have continued to make it worse, unless one of you replies to me by the end of today – that is, by 6pm, Monday, May 5, 2025 –  advising me as to how you intend to solve my problem, I will be copying this correspondence to EWON and beginning the process of replacing Powershop entirely as our supplier.

If your complacency with angry customers is such that you feel you have no need to respond and are prepared to let them walk away, so be it.

If otherwise, however, in anticipation, I look forward to your prompt reply.

Graham Lauren

0416 171724

 

Unless Powershop sorts out its possibly fraudulent ineptitude in its management of our accounts, we will be leaving it entirely as our supplier, and promoting our dissatisfaction to the media

 

I have long been far from happy with Powershop as a supplier, but I am now disgusted at its ineptitude in managing our accounts, for reasons I outline beneath.

I currently have two accounts with Powershop:

For our office, for Shiro Architects, at 308/35 Buckingham Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010:  806727253

For our home, at 301 2 Shirley Street, Alexandria NSW 2015: 831047257

 

First problem:

On Thursday, 20 March, I received an email without an invoice attached referring to an account numbered 833919141 – nothing to do with us at all – telling me: Just a heads up – there’s a payment of $175.08 overdue on your electricity account. You’ll need to make payment by 31 March 2025. It has links embedded in the page to make payments, but it appears entirely fraudulent. 

At best, If this is not just a Powershop con, it appears to suggest that your systems may have been hacked and your security compromised in managing your customers’ financial interests. 

As this is extremely bad and embarrassing news, if this is the case, this is something both your customers and the media need to know about, which is of course what will happen – I used to work for the Australian Financial Review, so I know exactly how this works.

 

Second problem:

On 25 March 2025, I received an email telling me: Powershop 806727253 Account has $606.73 owing. 

On 25 March, I then received another email telling me that this amount had gone up to $682.89, and this extra amount accounted for the period 8 February 2025 – 8 March 2025. 

Yet, on March 13, I had called Powershop to advise its representative that because our neighbour’s office on our floor at 35 Buckingham Street had experienced a fire on February 8, our office would be unusable for a minimum of six months, meaning that if we got billed for any usage after this date, it would be fraudulent. It appears that this is exactly what has occurred.

On 25 March, I received third email from Powershop telling me:

Please be advised we have issued you two bills today.

You have recently advised there was a fire at site on 07/02/25, so we have estimated usage up to this date, and manually created your next bill with zero usage.

This is manifestly untrue.

 

Third problem:

On Friday, March 28, I then received an email – to my personal email address, nothing to do with my business – saying:

You left a little something behind

Hi Shiro Architects Pty Ltd,

You’ve still got a credit of $659.10 on your closed Powershop account. Get in touch on 1800 462 668 and we’ll help get you reunited with your cash.

However, although we may well do so when we sell our office, which may occur later this year, we have not closed our account, so why I have received this message is a mystery.

Please explain by reply why your systems are so broken and sort out this mess at your end, or it is extremely likely that we will be moving our household account in the very near future from Powershop, too.  

And I will relish publicising the story of your broken systems on my own web site, Shonkr.Com, which exists precisely to discourage others from doing business with shonky suppliers.

I look forward to your prompt reply as to how you will resolve this problem for me.

Graham Lauren

0416 171724